Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:United States presidential election, 2012 (view source)

Revision as of 13:45, September 16, 2011

377 bytes added ,  13:45, September 16, 2011
→‎Separate section for declared and undeclared: Politics is like an iceberg: 90% is below the surface. Conservapedia is not limited to the 10% that occurs above the surface.
Line 250: Line 250:  
::The table is a ranking by likelihood.  Whether someone has officially declared or not is only one of many factors affecting likelihood.  We had Rick Perry high on the list well before he declared, and rightly so.  Likewise, Jeb Bush should remain high on the list because he could still decide to enter the race and would immediately become the frontrunner if he did.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:22, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::The table is a ranking by likelihood.  Whether someone has officially declared or not is only one of many factors affecting likelihood.  We had Rick Perry high on the list well before he declared, and rightly so.  Likewise, Jeb Bush should remain high on the list because he could still decide to enter the race and would immediately become the frontrunner if he did.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:22, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::But the difference is, there were rumblings of Perry running for months before he declared. That has not been the case with Jeb Bush, as it is highly unlikely he will run. You claim that  "whether someone has officially declared or not is only one of many factors affecting likelihood"; I would like to see your paramaters for determining this likelihood. Do you have a formula? [[User:AaronL|AaronL]] 09:37, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::But the difference is, there were rumblings of Perry running for months before he declared. That has not been the case with Jeb Bush, as it is highly unlikely he will run. You claim that  "whether someone has officially declared or not is only one of many factors affecting likelihood"; I would like to see your paramaters for determining this likelihood. Do you have a formula? [[User:AaronL|AaronL]] 09:37, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::The introduction and table in the entry explain the factors and reasons, and you're welcome to improve them, while adhering to the concise, informative format of the entry.
 +
 +
:::Politics is like an iceberg: 90% is below the surface.  ''Conservapedia'' is not limited to the 10% that occurs above the surface.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:45, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,900

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/916742"

Navigation menu