Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − +
Talk:Ontological argument (view source)
Revision as of 16:32, September 16, 2011
, 16:32, September 16, 2011→problems of presupposing necessity
== problems of presupposing necessity ==
== problems of presupposing necessity ==
What might it mean to say that no kind of thing exists necessarily? It seems to me that this question is the tacit root of the Ontological Argument. It was the reason I had added the things that comprised the now-deleted Counter-criticism section. [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 12:29, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
What might it mean to say that no kind of thing exists necessarily? It seems to me that this question is the tacit root of the Ontological Argument. It was the reason I had added the things that comprised the now-deleted Counter-criticism section. I think most people assume that there is something which is unchanging and which underlies all the physical world. For atheists, this would be a Unified Field Theory, String Theory, or etc. [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 12:29, 16 September 2011 (EDT)