Changes

::::Is history a social science? Are social sciences part of science? The answers to both of those questions is yes. The historical evidence is valid evidence for the Bible and it cannot logically be swept under the rug. Archeological evidence has been found that corroborate historical accounts in Genesis plus we have historical/archaeological evidence relating to other parts of the Bible such as resurrection of Jesus Christ. For example, please see evidence relating to the Tower of Babel and other events described in the book of Genesis [http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/140-the-tower-of-babel-legend-or-history HERE] and [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a021.html HERE] and [http://www.ucg.ca/booklets/BA1/genesisrecord.asp HERE]. I see no logical reason to withhold relevant evidence and see it as fallacious reasoning that employs the [[fallacy of exclusion]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

::::Is history a social science? Are social sciences part of science? The answers to both of those questions is yes. The historical evidence is valid evidence for the Bible and it cannot logically be swept under the rug. Archeological evidence has been found that corroborate historical accounts in Genesis plus we have historical/archaeological evidence relating to other parts of the Bible such as resurrection of Jesus Christ. For example, please see evidence relating to the Tower of Babel and other events described in the book of Genesis [http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/140-the-tower-of-babel-legend-or-history HERE] and [http://www.christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a021.html HERE] and [http://www.ucg.ca/booklets/BA1/genesisrecord.asp HERE]. I see no logical reason to withhold relevant evidence and see it as fallacious reasoning that employs the [[fallacy of exclusion]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

:::::::Rudrick, by the way, as far as response to Question #1 nothing happens "by chance".  The probability/chance of a coin coming up heads is 50%, but probability/chance does not make it come up heads. Chance/probability is just descriptive, but it is not a causal agent. Please read [http://books.google.com/books?id=OXoefj6r-_0C&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=chance+cover+for+ignorance+quote+sproule&source=bl&ots=GtwbYTbfLt&sig=BbLC1HwH1ohYinXnauDLyCUpMOU&hl=en&ei=SRNzTuPAErDH0AGX-ZS1DQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false this]. Lastly, I am a Protestant and obviously being a Protestant, I believe the Roman Catholic Church has made many errors. For example, the Galileo incident. I sadly have to make the confession that I am still not impressed with your response to Question #1 and I still feel little compulsion to read your responses to the rest of the questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:16, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

:::::::Rudrick, by the way, as far as response to Question #1 nothing happens "by chance".  The probability/chance of a coin coming up heads is 50%, but probability/chance does not make it come up heads. Chance/probability is just descriptive, but it is not a causal agent. Please read [http://books.google.com/books?id=OXoefj6r-_0C&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=chance+cover+for+ignorance+quote+sproule&source=bl&ots=GtwbYTbfLt&sig=BbLC1HwH1ohYinXnauDLyCUpMOU&hl=en&ei=SRNzTuPAErDH0AGX-ZS1DQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false this]. Lastly, I am a Protestant and obviously being a Protestant, I believe the Roman Catholic Church has made many errors. For example, the Galileo incident. I sadly have to make the confession that I am still not impressed with your response to Question #1 and I still feel little compulsion to read your responses to the rest of the questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:16, 16 September 2011 (EDT)

== [[Origin of life]] is part of the evolutionary paradigm ==

== [[Origin of life]] is part of the evolutionary paradigm ==