2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 383:
Line 383: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 14:31, September 17, 2011
, 14:31, September 17, 2011→Number of "counterexamples": new section
The HIV example is terrible evidence against evolution, as HIV is a relatively new disease in humans and the genetic mutation that provides immunity is rare. Additionally, HIV affects a relatively small proportion of the population. There is no way for universal immunity to HIV to develop in a few generations. This counterexample is extremely weak, and undermines the integrity of the article.[[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 01:52, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
The HIV example is terrible evidence against evolution, as HIV is a relatively new disease in humans and the genetic mutation that provides immunity is rare. Additionally, HIV affects a relatively small proportion of the population. There is no way for universal immunity to HIV to develop in a few generations. This counterexample is extremely weak, and undermines the integrity of the article.[[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 01:52, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
== Number of "counterexamples" ==
The lead para of this page says there are 61 "counterexamples" in it. I checked and there are 51. How do you bozos expect to disprove 152 years of research in evolution when you can't even count? --[[User:BarryThomas|BarryThomas]] 10:31, 17 September 2011 (EDT)