SkipCaptcha
966
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: +
→PETA and stuff
It's not that i don't think they are liberal, or that they want to redefine the word, the problem is the size of PETA and supporters is insignificant in the literal world, making the "redefinition" of a person a pipe dream at best--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:24, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
It's not that i don't think they are liberal, or that they want to redefine the word, the problem is the size of PETA and supporters is insignificant in the literal world, making the "redefinition" of a person a pipe dream at best--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:24, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
::The overwhelming majority of Americans are pro-life and believe in the Biblical account of creation instead of evolution, and yet a "insignificant" number of liberals "in the literal world" have worked to marginalize those points of view. The numerical size of a movement is irrelevant. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 10:40, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
::The overwhelming majority of Americans are pro-life and believe in the Biblical account of creation instead of evolution, and yet a "insignificant" number of liberals "in the literal world" have worked to marginalize those points of view. The numerical size of a movement is irrelevant. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 10:40, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
:::And they have pretty much failed at that goal obviously if a overwhelming majority don't believe them. I see why you want it in, i just have a different standard of what counts as a real and possible attempt to redefine the word--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:46, 17 September 2011 (EDT)