48
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 98:
Line 98: + +
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
::::::::Abrown, what do comments such as above serve? Are you incapable of addressing the subject under discussion, so you turn your attention in an abusive manner to the person you are speaking with? What purpose does that serve? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:08, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::Abrown, what do comments such as above serve? Are you incapable of addressing the subject under discussion, so you turn your attention in an abusive manner to the person you are speaking with? What purpose does that serve? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:08, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::: Is that not obvious? I'm attempting to shame Mr. Schlafly in to realising his actions are hypocritical, in requiring a greater burden of proof of others than he does of himself. The easiest thing for him to do would be simply to back his assertions with testimony from a primary source. Unfortunately either he has no shame at all, or he has not the wit to realise just how hypocritical his actions are. I am certainly not willing to contribute to any discussion where the end result is not going to be a consensus, but simply whatever it is that Mr. Schlafly happens to believe. If the sort of edits that Mr. Schlafly made were made to the article by anyone else, they would be called vandalism and reverted. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 15:49, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:22, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:22, 7 April 2007 (EDT)