Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 214: Line 214:  
::::::::::Sam, if you sincerely want to stop the spread of atheism and evolutionism create some new articles on [[atheism]] and [[evolution]]. This is something which I don't believe you have done yet. Here is a list of some of the articles that need to be created: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Atheism_Project [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:31, 18 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::::::Sam, if you sincerely want to stop the spread of atheism and evolutionism create some new articles on [[atheism]] and [[evolution]]. This is something which I don't believe you have done yet. Here is a list of some of the articles that need to be created: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Atheism_Project [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:31, 18 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::::::That's where we disagree. I DON'T think most of these articles need to be created, and many of them could actually be counter-productive. What's the point of an article on "Atheism and God"? What's it going to say - "They don't believe in Him"? What is the "Atheism and Obesity" article intended to achieve? Are people supposed to accept Christ as part of a weight loss plan? You've pointed out elsewhere that this article is 20 pages long, and indeed it is. On the other hand CP's article on hydrogen - which is only the most abundant and important element in the entire universe - is barely more than a stub. Are we trying to create a valuable resource where people can find useful information without being subjected to the biases of Wikipedia - a trustworthy encyclopaedia, in other words - or just have some fun calling PZ Myers a gutbucket? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 10:30, 18 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::::::That's where we disagree. I DON'T think most of these articles need to be created, and many of them could actually be counter-productive. What's the point of an article on "Atheism and God"? What's it going to say - "They don't believe in Him"? What is the "Atheism and Obesity" article intended to achieve? Are people supposed to accept Christ as part of a weight loss plan? You've pointed out elsewhere that this article is 20 pages long, and indeed it is. On the other hand CP's article on hydrogen - which is only the most abundant and important element in the entire universe - is barely more than a stub. Are we trying to create a valuable resource where people can find useful information without being subjected to the biases of Wikipedia - a trustworthy encyclopaedia, in other words - or just have some fun calling PZ Myers a gutbucket? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 10:30, 18 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
::::::::::::::I suspected that you are an atheist and that you would not create any new evolution or atheism articles. Of course, this further confirms my suspicions. You did say that you don't think MOST of these articles need to be created. It will be very telling if you don't create any new atheism or evolution articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:09, 18 September 2011 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,811

edits

Navigation menu