Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)

Revision as of 06:10, September 20, 2011

277 bytes added ,  06:10, September 20, 2011
→‎Rate of extinction: Why would the extinction rate vary much over time? There is no evidence that it does, or any plausible reason to expect it to.
Line 389: Line 389:  
Evolutionists say that there was period of history when extinction rate was far higher than speciation (generation of species) rate and other period when it was the opposite. We are just currently in one of those times when extinction rate is higher (mostly because of human activity).<br/>
 
Evolutionists say that there was period of history when extinction rate was far higher than speciation (generation of species) rate and other period when it was the opposite. We are just currently in one of those times when extinction rate is higher (mostly because of human activity).<br/>
 
I believe this counterexample does not prove anything.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
I believe this counterexample does not prove anything.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Evolutionary theory speculates about many things, and much of it is implausible.  Why would the extinction rate vary much over time?  There is no evidence that it does, or any plausible reason to expect it to.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:10, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,934

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/918316"

Navigation menu