nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + +
Conservapedia talk:Teamwork (view source)
Revision as of 21:10, April 7, 2007
, 21:10, April 7, 2007no edit summary
*Hmmmmmmm, never been a member of a board or site where the Admins were not clearly identified, Ed. How on earth would members know who is giving correct policy advice, and who isn't? And IRC, isn't that a bit of an archaic reference, in 2007? Well, I have to go unload those sandbags you dropped off......--~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 09:08, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
*Hmmmmmmm, never been a member of a board or site where the Admins were not clearly identified, Ed. How on earth would members know who is giving correct policy advice, and who isn't? And IRC, isn't that a bit of an archaic reference, in 2007? Well, I have to go unload those sandbags you dropped off......--~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 09:08, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
**When laying down the law, we can say, "I am a sysop and you better (do this)." Or whip out your badge for the occasion. --sysop [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:28, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
**When laying down the law, we can say, "I am a sysop and you better (do this)." Or whip out your badge for the occasion. --sysop [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:28, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Ahhh, so more a sop to those very few people, mostly liberal, with authority issues, insecure individuals?--~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 17:10, 7 April 2007 (EDT)