Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
167 bytes added ,  23:18, September 21, 2011
Line 336: Line 336:  
::Fine, but that's completely irrelevant to what he's saying, which is that conservatives should support gay marriage because the Constitution requires it. He's correct, but then conservatives should also OPPOSE gay marriage because the Bible forbids homosexuality, and the Bible is obviously correct too. The issue seems to be what is more important: the Constitution or the Bible. It's a tricky one. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:10, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::Fine, but that's completely irrelevant to what he's saying, which is that conservatives should support gay marriage because the Constitution requires it. He's correct, but then conservatives should also OPPOSE gay marriage because the Bible forbids homosexuality, and the Bible is obviously correct too. The issue seems to be what is more important: the Constitution or the Bible. It's a tricky one. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:10, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Were the founding fathers of America pro-homosexuality? In various states, were there anti-sodomy laws during the post independence colonial period and did any of the founding fathers of America object to them? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:15, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Were the founding fathers of America pro-homosexuality? In various states, were there anti-sodomy laws during the post independence colonial period and did any of the founding fathers of America object to them? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:15, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::Again, that's irrelevant. He's talking about the Constitution, specifically the Establishment Clause. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:18, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
24

edits

Navigation menu