Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
277 bytes added ,  23:23, September 21, 2011
Line 339: Line 339:  
::::Again, that's irrelevant. He's talking about the Constitution, specifically the Establishment Clause. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:18, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Again, that's irrelevant. He's talking about the Constitution, specifically the Establishment Clause. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:18, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
If liberals interpretation of the Constitution is correct, then why was there a U.S Senate chaplain shortly after the U.S. Constitution?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:21, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
If liberals interpretation of the Constitution is correct, then why was there a U.S Senate chaplain shortly after the U.S. Constitution?[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:21, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Are you incapable of sticking to the subject? The Establishment Clause forbids ESTABLISHMENT of a religion, and appointing a Chaplain to teh Senate for those who want his services isn't establishing a religion. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:23, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
24

edits

Navigation menu