Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
303 bytes added ,  23:28, September 21, 2011
Line 342: Line 342:  
:::::Are you incapable of sticking to the subject? The Establishment Clause forbids ESTABLISHMENT of a religion, and appointing a Chaplain to the Senate for those who want his services isn't establishing a religion. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:23, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::Are you incapable of sticking to the subject? The Establishment Clause forbids ESTABLISHMENT of a religion, and appointing a Chaplain to the Senate for those who want his services isn't establishing a religion. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:23, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
Does American law borrow from English common law and cite precedence from English common law? How did common law treat sodomy? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:25, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
Does American law borrow from English common law and cite precedence from English common law? How did common law treat sodomy? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:25, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:What's your problem? I'm not TALKING about common law, I'm talking about the CONSTITUTION. RudrickBoucher has brought up a challenging point about what conservatives should think, so can you either stick to the subject or go somewhere else? --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:28, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Have U.S Senate chaplains been paid for exclusively by believers or do all taxpayers have to contribute to their salaries? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:28, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Have U.S Senate chaplains been paid for exclusively by believers or do all taxpayers have to contribute to their salaries? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:28, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
24

edits

Navigation menu