Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
378 bytes added ,  23:43, September 21, 2011
Line 348: Line 348:     
:Still irrelevant. This is a discussion about the Establishment Clause, not common law, promiscuity or what the idiots at Sickipedia say. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:38, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:Still irrelevant. This is a discussion about the Establishment Clause, not common law, promiscuity or what the idiots at Sickipedia say. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 19:38, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
::Again, what does British common law say about sodomy? Again, did post independence colonial America heavily borrow from English common law? Again, did post independent colonial America states have ant-sodomy laws and did the founding fathers object to them?  '''Why can't you answer a few simple questions? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:43, 21 September 2011 (EDT)'''
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,123

edits

Navigation menu