Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
295 bytes added ,  01:02, September 22, 2011
m
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:  
<ref>
 
<ref>
   −
See [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]].
+
See [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] and also Einstein's paper dropped from the bibloigraphy of Einstein's papers in 1973 ''"Gravitation"'' in which Einstein advocated non symmetric metric tensor of spacetime while the Big Bang [[relativists]] assume symmetric metric in that book.
    
</ref>. [[Relativists]] insisted that it is not an illusion but a real expansion. Though no scientific theory of expansion could be constructed as it contradicted the conservation laws (conservation of energy and momentum) so the hypothesis of expansion became a true [[cargo cult science]] as described by [[Richard Feynman]] in his rant against [[relativists]].
 
</ref>. [[Relativists]] insisted that it is not an illusion but a real expansion. Though no scientific theory of expansion could be constructed as it contradicted the conservation laws (conservation of energy and momentum) so the hypothesis of expansion became a true [[cargo cult science]] as described by [[Richard Feynman]] in his rant against [[relativists]].
Line 8: Line 8:  
The illusion of expansion is explained in [[Gravitation demystified]] and so '''Einstein's radius''' would be about 13 billion light years. The number coming from division of speed of light by [[Hubble constant]] that represent the [[intrinsic redshift]] in the universe that is result of Newtonian calculation of [[dynamical friction]] of photons in a stationary [[Einstein's universe]]
 
The illusion of expansion is explained in [[Gravitation demystified]] and so '''Einstein's radius''' would be about 13 billion light years. The number coming from division of speed of light by [[Hubble constant]] that represent the [[intrinsic redshift]] in the universe that is result of Newtonian calculation of [[dynamical friction]] of photons in a stationary [[Einstein's universe]]
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
−
See the step-by-step derivation of [[intrinsic redshift]] and [[Hubble constant]] in [[Gravitation demystified]].
+
See the step-by-step derivation of [[intrinsic redshift]] and [[Hubble constant]] in [[Gravitation demystified]] that an intelligent high school student may follow.
 
</ref>.
 
</ref>.
 
The exact value of '''Einstein's radius''' predicted theoretically as value at which the Einstein's field equation is stable or derived from [[intrinsic redshift]] of photons, is
 
The exact value of '''Einstein's radius''' predicted theoretically as value at which the Einstein's field equation is stable or derived from [[intrinsic redshift]] of photons, is
SkipCaptcha
708

edits

Navigation menu