87
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 353:
Line 353: +
Talk:Same-sex marriage (view source)
Revision as of 05:34, September 22, 2011
, 05:34, September 22, 2011→It's all about separation of church and state!
::When determining the validity of a law in the United States, the constitution > federal law > state law > local law > British common law. It's that simple.--[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 19:53, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
::When determining the validity of a law in the United States, the constitution > federal law > state law > local law > British common law. It's that simple.--[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 19:53, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Richard, first sox, then shoes. Address my question and information rebutting your claim. Is it aberrational lust or love? (and please do address my two citations.) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:56, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Richard, first sox, then shoes. Address my question and information rebutting your claim. Is it aberrational lust or love? (and please do address my two citations.) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:56, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::It is love. Plain and simple. If you doubt that, I suggest you do my job. Tell a stranger that his life partner has died, that you witnessed it, and that he couldn't simply because their relationship is homosexual instead of heterosexual. --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 01:34, 22 September 2011 (EDT)