63
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: +
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conspiracy theories (view source)
Revision as of 21:07, September 23, 2011
, 21:07, September 23, 2011from main page
#The only article on Wikipedia that gets the death toll from the Khmer Rouge correct is Wikipedia's Pol Pot biography, which states 1.7 to 2.5 million were killed. This really does accurately state both the minimum and maximum plausible estimates. Even so, it feels sociopathically compelled to lie for Pol Pot (the greatest mass murderer in history). For example, it writes that "only 80,000 to 100,000 of these were directly killed."<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_Pot</ref> This claim is not just jaw-droppingly stupid; anyone who knows a thing or two about Cambodia might well laugh out loud reading it. As mentioned above, genocide investigators have proven that at least ten times this number were violently executed.
#The only article on Wikipedia that gets the death toll from the Khmer Rouge correct is Wikipedia's Pol Pot biography, which states 1.7 to 2.5 million were killed. This really does accurately state both the minimum and maximum plausible estimates. Even so, it feels sociopathically compelled to lie for Pol Pot (the greatest mass murderer in history). For example, it writes that "only 80,000 to 100,000 of these were directly killed."<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_Pot</ref> This claim is not just jaw-droppingly stupid; anyone who knows a thing or two about Cambodia might well laugh out loud reading it. As mentioned above, genocide investigators have proven that at least ten times this number were violently executed.
#Wonderful news: For now, Wikipedia has eliminated its claim on "Operation Menu" that the US bombing killed more people than the Khmer Rouge! Their estimate for the bombing is now 50-200,000. Hey, you have to start somewhere.
#Wonderful news: For now, Wikipedia has eliminated its claim on "Operation Menu" that the US bombing killed more people than the Khmer Rouge! Their estimate for the bombing is now 50-200,000. Hey, you have to start somewhere.
#In Wikipedia's page on the ABC's docudrama <i>The Path to 9/11</i>, the page contains a section titles "Controversy and criticisms," which contains 19 sub-sections to support it, while the section titled "Controversy: support for The Path to 9/11" only contains four, despite the fact that the controversy was sparked by pro-Clinton liberals that failed to see the fact that the two-part miniseries criticized both Bush and Clinton administrations leading up to 9/11 and that writer Cyrus Nowrasteh stated that many of their consultants on it stated that the docudrama went easy on Clinton. It also fails to note John Ziegler's documentary on the censoring of the docudrama <i>Blocking the Path to 9/11</i> [http://www.johnziegler.com/], which contains interviews with many people on the topic, and points out how the [[MSM]] liberals and Clintons have smeared it so much that it has destroyed it from ever being shown on TV or being sold on DVD in the near-future. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_9/11]
== References ==
== References ==