Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: − + − − Despite the above speculation of the ''Scientific American'', a study found that "Psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55%) of bestiality than the control groups (10% and 15% respectively)."<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1778686 A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff - Int J Psychosom. 1991;38(1-4):45-7.]</ref>
Scientific American (view source)
Revision as of 22:22, September 23, 2011
, 22:22, September 23, 2011→The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality
See also: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] and [[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Irreligion and superstition]]
See also: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] and [[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Irreligion and superstition]]
The pro-[[evolution]] magazine the ''Scientific American'' speciously made this unwarranted speculation via their blog on the aberrant practice of [[bestiality]]:
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The pro-[[evolution]] magazine the ''Scientific American'' speciously made this unwarranted speculation via their blog on the aberrant practice of [[bestiality]]:
{{cquote|After all, we are animals....
{{cquote|After all, we are animals....
In any event, philosophical questions aside, I simply find it astounding — and incredibly fascinating from an [[evolution|evolutionary]] perspective — that so many people (as much as a full percent of the general population) are certifiable zoophiles. And scientific researchers appear to be slowly conceding that zoophilia may be a genuine human sexual orientation.<ref>Animal Lovers: Zoophiles Make Scientists Rethink Human Sexuality By Jesse Bering, March 24, 2010</ref>}}
In any event, philosophical questions aside, I simply find it astounding — and incredibly fascinating from an [[evolution|evolutionary]] perspective — that so many people (as much as a full percent of the general population) are certifiable zoophiles. And scientific researchers appear to be slowly conceding that zoophilia may be a genuine human sexual orientation.<ref>Animal Lovers: Zoophiles Make Scientists Rethink Human Sexuality By Jesse Bering, March 24, 2010</ref>}}
Concerning the aberrant practice of [[homosexuality]], the licentious [[liberal]] community [[Views on Homosexuality|has more favorable views]] on [[homosexuality]] than [[conservative]]s plus has a history of inflating the number of people who are homosexuals.<ref>[http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=2099 How Bad Science Helped Launch the 'Gay' Revolution] By Robert H. Knight</ref> In addition, liberals [[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality|are more likely to believe]] in evolutionary pseudoscience. Thus, it is not surprising the ''Scientific American'' engaged in the above cited speculation.
Concerning the aberrant practice of [[homosexuality]], the licentious [[liberal]] community [[Views on Homosexuality|has more favorable views]] on [[homosexuality]] than [[conservative]]s plus has a history of inflating the number of people who are homosexuals.<ref>[http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=2099 How Bad Science Helped Launch the 'Gay' Revolution] By Robert H. Knight</ref> In addition, liberals [[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality|are more likely to believe]] in evolutionary pseudoscience. Thus, it is not surprising the ''Scientific American'' engaged in the above cited speculation.