Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
248 bytes added ,  23:01, April 7, 2007
Line 111: Line 111:     
:Better to say that (Source A) objects to terms like ''evolutionism'' and ''evolutionist'' on the grounds that they connote, etc. Make it clear that the usage objections are one-sided. I haven't heard any evolutionist complain about the term ''anti-evolutionist''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Better to say that (Source A) objects to terms like ''evolutionism'' and ''evolutionist'' on the grounds that they connote, etc. Make it clear that the usage objections are one-sided. I haven't heard any evolutionist complain about the term ''anti-evolutionist''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:54, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: because it's a daft term? we are more likely to use "unscientific", "ignorant" and the like? Anti-evolutionist is not used by anyone because the queen's english provides plenty of terms already. --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 19:01, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==Evolutionism as a [[worldview]]==
 
==Evolutionism as a [[worldview]]==
186

edits

Navigation menu