Changes

[[Image:5712dawkins.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|[[Richard Dawkins]] ]]

[[Image:5712dawkins.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|[[Richard Dawkins]] ]]

In [[Richard Dawkins]]' intellectual bunnyhole where Dawkins [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates|hides from the cross examination of strong debate opponents]],  Richard Dawkins engages in his public machinations and claims that he is an intellectually fulfilled [[atheism|atheist]]. Dawkins alleges that [[Charles Darwin]] made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist".<ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/how-to-be-an-intellectually-fulfilled-atheist-or-not/</ref>  Yet, where is Richard Dawkins' intellectual conviction and courage? Certainly, Richard Dawkins has displayed abundant evidence that he lacks true conviction and courage to defend [[atheism]] and the [[evolution|evolutionary paradigm]] (please see the [[satire]] [[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]]). Also, why did [[Charles Darwin]] have so little intellectual fulfillment?  Late in Darwin's life, Charles Darwin told the Duke of Argyll that he frequently had overwhelming thoughts that the natural world was the [[Intelligent design|result of design]].<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html</ref> Dawkins' [[Richard Dawkins' public refusal to debate creationists|ruses about why he supposedly will not debate creationists]] and [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates|other strong theist debate opponents]] are a poor substitute for intellectual courage and fulfillment! If Richard Dawkins is an intellectually satisfied atheist then it must take exceedingly little to intellectually satisfy Richard Dawkins!  The atheism porridge bowl [[atheism|is certainly empty when it comes to proof and evidence for atheism]].  It is very sad to see Richard Dawkins, the gaunt and hungry intellectual hyena, run away from the [[Christian]] [[Bible]] believing lions when he could do much better.  There certainly is an [[Christian apologetics|abundance of evidence pointing to Christianity being true]] and [[atehism|atheism being false]].

Dawkins alleges that [[Charles Darwin]] made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist".<ref>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/how-to-be-an-intellectually-fulfilled-atheist-or-not/</ref>  Yet, where is Richard Dawkins' intellectual conviction and courage?  

In [[Richard Dawkins]]' intellectual bunnyhole where Dawkins [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates|hides from the cross examination of strong debate opponents]],  Richard Dawkins engages in his public machinations and claims that he is an intellectually fulfilled [[atheism|atheist]]. Certainly, Richard Dawkins has displayed abundant evidence that he lacks true conviction and courage to defend [[atheism]] and the [[evolution|evolutionary paradigm]] (please see the [[satire]] [[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]]). Also, why did [[Charles Darwin]] have so little intellectual fulfillment?  Late in Darwin's life, Charles Darwin told the Duke of Argyll that he frequently had overwhelming thoughts that the natural world was the [[Intelligent design|result of design]].<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html</ref> Dawkins' [[Richard Dawkins' public refusal to debate creationists|ruses about why he supposedly will not debate creationists]] and [[Instances of Richard Dawkins ducking debates|other strong theist debate opponents]] are a poor substitute for intellectual courage and fulfillment! If Richard Dawkins is an intellectually satisfied atheist then it must take exceedingly little to intellectually satisfy Richard Dawkins!  The atheism porridge bowl [[atheism|is certainly empty when it comes to proof and evidence for atheism]].  It is very sad to see Richard Dawkins, the gaunt and hungry intellectual hyena, run away from the [[Christian]] [[Bible]] believing lions when he could do much better.  There certainly is an [[Christian apologetics|abundance of evidence pointing to Christianity being true]] and [[atehism|atheism being false]].

== See also ==

== See also ==