suggest removing pre-emptive verdict on CERN results
Line 1:
Line 1:
{{articletalkheader|prefix=archive}}
{{articletalkheader|prefix=archive}}
+
+
==FTL Neutrinos at LHC ==
+
+
It may be jumping the gun to put the finding from Friday as evidence against GR. The results have yet to be duplicated - duplicability is needed for a claim to have scientific merit - and have yet to be carefully peer reviewed. The results are significant at the 95% CI but that means there's a 1 in 20 chance they're actually inaccurate. Given how many measurements are made at the LHC some are going to be both statistically significant and incorrect. It may be more prudent to wait to see if it's a one off or measurement error. I propose waiting at least until other particle acceleration labs can attempt to duplicate the results to make any judgement; after all, that's what CERN is doing
+
--[[User:BillyWest|BillyWest]] 00:18, 26 September 2011 (EDT)