Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,387
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + + +
→quick note: new section
I saw your change to the categories in [[Essay: Worst Liberal Books|this essay]], and I greatly appreciate your quick response. Your change is more than satisfactory, so unless anyone objects, I think it's fine to remain. Thank you again! [[User:KevinDavis|Kevin Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]</sup> 23:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
I saw your change to the categories in [[Essay: Worst Liberal Books|this essay]], and I greatly appreciate your quick response. Your change is more than satisfactory, so unless anyone objects, I think it's fine to remain. Thank you again! [[User:KevinDavis|Kevin Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]</sup> 23:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
== quick note ==
An atheist internet vandal community of obscure atheists had an opportunity to debate me, but they blew it. All they had to do is give $20,000 to a trustworthy Christian and have that person donate money to a Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability certified Christian relief organization. They never showed they had a trustworthy Christian and I suggested giving the money to a Bible believing pastor. However, they chose not to which was no big deal to me as I didn't feel they wanted to meet my conditions anyways. As far as my personal schedule, while I do value being flexible, I did not stick to some priorities I set for myself and in retrospect, I shouldn't have done this, but there are certainly still a lot of opportunities to pursue in the world and there is no sense crying over spilled milk.
With that being said, if you would like to see some non-obscure atheists debate me, have them make me an attractive offer and I certainly can consider their offer. Given that [[global Christianity]] is a vibrant and growing community and the atheist community is losing about 300 people a day, I would think there would be an eagerness on their part to debate to try to turn things around despite the fact that God never loses. Richard Dawkins and Penn Jillette do seem to realize that atheism is worldview for fools and it cannot be credibly defended (See: [[Daniel Came]]). By the way, my debate offer to Penn Jillette still stands, but he does seem to be rather timid when it comes to debating. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:00, 27 September 2011 (EDT)