43
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: +
→quick note
::::Perhaps this discussion could happen on someone else's page, I will not be debating anyone anytime soon. --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 00:11, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Perhaps this discussion could happen on someone else's page, I will not be debating anyone anytime soon. --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 00:11, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:::DrDean, if you want to feign ignorance, I have no problem with that. I do briefly want to tell LeanardS they didn't meet my conditions and I am certainly under no obligation to meet conditions of obscure atheists who run vandal websites. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:13, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:::DrDean, if you want to feign ignorance, I have no problem with that. I do briefly want to tell LeanardS they didn't meet my conditions and I am certainly under no obligation to meet conditions of obscure atheists who run vandal websites. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:13, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::Oh, but internationally known personalities like [[Richard Dawkins]], [[PZ Myers]] and [[Penn Jillette]] are under some obligation to debate with you or your "friend" Shockofgod? Interesting. Please, Ken, do explain the difference. --[[User:LeonardS|LeonardS]] 00:21, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
::::No problem; I'll start a new section on Ken's talk page about it.
::::No problem; I'll start a new section on Ken's talk page about it.
::::Oh wait, I can't. So I'll move it to the [[talk:cowardice]] page instead. That seems appropriate. --[[User:LeonardS|LeonardS]] 00:15, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Oh wait, I can't. So I'll move it to the [[talk:cowardice]] page instead. That seems appropriate. --[[User:LeonardS|LeonardS]] 00:15, 27 September 2011 (EDT)