43
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
→quick note
With that being said, if you would like to see some non-obscure atheists debate me, have them make me an attractive offer and I certainly can consider their offer. Given that [[global Christianity]] is a vibrant and growing community and the atheist community is losing about 300 people a day, I would think there would be an eagerness on their part to debate members of Christendom to try to turn things around despite the fact that God never loses and Christians time and time again are victorious over atheists in debate due to the utter weakness of atheism (see: [[Atheism and Debate]]). Richard Dawkins and Penn Jillette do seem to realize that atheism is worldview for fools and it cannot be credibly defended (See: [[Daniel Came]]). By the way, my debate offer to Penn Jillette still stands, but he does seem to be rather timid when it comes to debating. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:00, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
With that being said, if you would like to see some non-obscure atheists debate me, have them make me an attractive offer and I certainly can consider their offer. Given that [[global Christianity]] is a vibrant and growing community and the atheist community is losing about 300 people a day, I would think there would be an eagerness on their part to debate members of Christendom to try to turn things around despite the fact that God never loses and Christians time and time again are victorious over atheists in debate due to the utter weakness of atheism (see: [[Atheism and Debate]]). Richard Dawkins and Penn Jillette do seem to realize that atheism is worldview for fools and it cannot be credibly defended (See: [[Daniel Came]]). By the way, my debate offer to Penn Jillette still stands, but he does seem to be rather timid when it comes to debating. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:00, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:ALL they had to do was cough up $20K (actually I believe you demanded $27K, but I could be wrong) for the privilege of debating you? You value yourself too highly, Ken. And remind me, please, what happened when someone actually offered to PAY the $27,000 to debate you? Who was it that chickened out, exactly? --[[User:LeonardS|LeonardS]] 00:32, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:::So a bunch of atheists didn't want to pay $20,000 to debate an anonymous person on the internet? That is not surprising in the slightest. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 00:19, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:::So a bunch of atheists didn't want to pay $20,000 to debate an anonymous person on the internet? That is not surprising in the slightest. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 00:19, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
::::"All they had to do is give $20,000". Is that right? Is it $20,000 to have the privilege to debate with Conservative ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 00:22, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
::::"All they had to do is give $20,000". Is that right? Is it $20,000 to have the privilege to debate with Conservative ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 00:22, 27 September 2011 (EDT)