4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + +
Debate:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count? (view source)
Revision as of 16:34, January 6, 2007
, 16:34, January 6, 2007no edit summary
P.S. I know that the LaTex math is fun to use, but I don't think that this debate can be reasonably translated into mathematical equations.
P.S. I know that the LaTex math is fun to use, but I don't think that this debate can be reasonably translated into mathematical equations.
'''Comment''' It doesn't matter. Nobody ought to believe that a raw count of the number of entries in Conservapedia means very much anyway. Personally I think the page should just give rough round numbers and say "over 2000," "over 3000," etc. If anyone thought the count itself mattered, you could always write a computer program to generate a million entries like [[Four hundred and seventy-six]]: '''Four hundred and seventy-six is the number after four hundred and seventy-five and four hundred and seventy-seven. It is even. It is not prime. It is 476 in Arabic numerals and CDLXXVI in Roman numerals." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:34, 6 January 2007 (EST)