16
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + + +
Talk:Liberalism and bestiality (view source)
Revision as of 12:39, September 28, 2011
, 12:39, September 28, 2011→This article...: new section
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. [http://conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_Liberal_Bias#Athiests.3F Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists]. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. [http://conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_Liberal_Bias#Athiests.3F Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists]. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
== This article... ==
...like all the others on bestiality you've created during your latest frenzy, is a travesty of what Conservapedia is supposed to be. You should be ashamed of yourself. --[[User:TommyR|TommyR]] 08:39, 28 September 2011 (EDT)