37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + +
Talk:Liberalism and bestiality (view source)
Revision as of 04:39, October 1, 2011
, 04:39, October 1, 2011no edit summary
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. [http://conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_Liberal_Bias#Athiests.3F Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists]. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. [http://conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_Liberal_Bias#Athiests.3F Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists]. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
Atheism and Liberalism aren't like rectangles and squares, because while it is true that not all liberals are atheists, the same is true the other way around. My best friend from grade school was an atheist with many conservative positions, such as being against Gun Control, liberal taxes, and being anti-abortion. --[[User:SpenserL|SpenserL]] 00:39, 1 October 2011 (EDT)