Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,924
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + + + +
Talk:Bestiality and Britain (view source)
Revision as of 01:48, October 3, 2011
, 01:48, October 3, 2011→Probably should be mentioned in article: new section
There is no evidence whatsoever. Whom is the British study referring to? I would guess since the article is about Sweden it is referring to Swedes, but since the distinction isn't made, you can't know whom the study is referring to. In light of this, there is no link b/w Brits and bestiality presented. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 12:14, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
There is no evidence whatsoever. Whom is the British study referring to? I would guess since the article is about Sweden it is referring to Swedes, but since the distinction isn't made, you can't know whom the study is referring to. In light of this, there is no link b/w Brits and bestiality presented. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 12:14, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
== Probably should be mentioned in article ==
Bestiality is illegal in the United Kingdom. See [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3675057.stm here]. Did you know that only 32 states here in America have laws banning bestiality? It appears that many have banned it under animal rights codes, rather than because of morality. Also, [http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/Sample_chapter/9780631220800Sample/Reis9780631220800.pdf here's] an interesting paper about bestiality in early America. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 21:48, 2 October 2011 (EDT)