Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: + +
→No bias in the prize: Winston Churchill is the exception more than a half-century ago that "proves the rule" that has been enforced with increasing bias ever since.
This list is far from exhaustive, but it does illustrate the general lack of political bias in the Nobel committees. What the Nobel prize seeks to recognize is the overall impact of an individual's contribution to their field. --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 18:41, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
This list is far from exhaustive, but it does illustrate the general lack of political bias in the Nobel committees. What the Nobel prize seeks to recognize is the overall impact of an individual's contribution to their field. --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 18:41, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
::Your list underscores the bias. Friedman said he wasn't a conservative, and I don't think Buchanan is one either. As to Mullis, his award preceded the [[global warming]] liberal orthodoxy. Winston Churchill is the exception more than a half-century ago that "proves the rule" that has been enforced with increasing bias ever since.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:14, 3 October 2011 (EDT)