138
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 97:
Line 97: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→No bias in the prize
:::: That was more than 30 years ago, and Mother Teresa did not criticize the liberals theories of [[theory of evolution|evolution]] or [[theory of relativity|relativity]]. None of the scientists who have criticized those liberal falsehoods has ever been given a Nobel Prize, despite their tremendous achievements.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:56, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
:::: That was more than 30 years ago, and Mother Teresa did not criticize the liberals theories of [[theory of evolution|evolution]] or [[theory of relativity|relativity]]. None of the scientists who have criticized those liberal falsehoods has ever been given a Nobel Prize, despite their tremendous achievements.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:56, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
::::: The comment above was addressing the 'Bias against conservatives'. I haven't heard anyone describe relativity as a 'liberal falsehood' outside of this blog. I've heard 'Jewish falsehood' though....
::::: Anyway, more examples of conservatives who have won the prize:
:::::*Gary Becker (1992, Economics)
:::::*Henry Kissinger (1973, Peace)
:::::*[[George Stigler]] (1982, Economics; his Conservapedia article has him categorized as a conservative.)
:::::*Mario Vargas Llosa (2010, Literature; famous for critcizing Latin American far left)
:::::*Robert Mundell (1999, Economics; strong champion of tax cuts that inspired Reagan to do so)
:::::*William Golding (1983, Literature)
:::::*[[Ronald Coase|Ronald Coase ]]( 1991, Economics; par of the Chicago School of Economics and famous for his [[Coase theorem|eponymous theorem]])
:::::On Coase, [[Liberals_and_friendship|Conservapedia]] notes: "Nobel laureate Ronald Coase described how he was victimized by disparaging whispers at cocktail parties about his conservative economic positions". That was added by you, by the way.
:::::I await the rationalizations as to why these clear examples of conservative Nobel laureates does not disprove the Stockholm Liberal Conspiracy. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 12:33, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
::::::::Concerning evolution, I can't, simply because the theory of evolution is so much an integral part of modern biomedical science (the evidence is overwhelming, you may as well concede that point). As for relativity, like evolution, that's been improved upon quite a bit. So long as all you're trying to argue are the original points of the theory, any Nobel prize winner in physics for the past thirty years would suffice. --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 23:54, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
::::::::Concerning evolution, I can't, simply because the theory of evolution is so much an integral part of modern biomedical science (the evidence is overwhelming, you may as well concede that point). As for relativity, like evolution, that's been improved upon quite a bit. So long as all you're trying to argue are the original points of the theory, any Nobel prize winner in physics for the past thirty years would suffice. --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 23:54, 3 October 2011 (EDT)