56
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 465:
Line 465: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 22:51, October 4, 2011
, 22:51, October 4, 2011→Wait...what?: new section
: That article hardly justifies deleting the counterexample. The counterexample is being restored.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:48, 2 October 2011 (EDT)
: That article hardly justifies deleting the counterexample. The counterexample is being restored.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:48, 2 October 2011 (EDT)
::If you could explain to me what parts of the counterexample it fails to address, I'd be more than happy to find an alternate article. I dont see what points about whale evolution are not addressed within the article, however. Perhaps you missed one of the charts? [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 13:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)
::If you could explain to me what parts of the counterexample it fails to address, I'd be more than happy to find an alternate article. I dont see what points about whale evolution are not addressed within the article, however. Perhaps you missed one of the charts? [[User:FCapra|FCapra]] 13:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)
== Wait...what? ==
I have honestly never heard the following arguments used as counter-examples for evolution and I'm not sure I follow:
'''Animals flee to high ground before a deadly tsunami hits their shoreline, defying any plausible materialistic explanation.'''
'''Animals also sense when an earthquake is about to hit, once again defying atheistic explanations'''
How do these prove evolution doesn't exist? [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 18:51, 4 October 2011 (EDT)