Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4,581 bytes added ,  04:39, October 6, 2011
m
Created page with "== Great work! == Thanks so much for helping us revert vandalism!JacobB 19:11, 3 May 2010 (EDT) :Thank you. I've been here before, so I know annoying those littl..."
== Great work! ==

Thanks so much for helping us revert vandalism![[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:11, 3 May 2010 (EDT)
:Thank you. I've been here before, so I know annoying those little flies can be. [[User:JonG|JonG]] 19:12, 3 May 2010 (EDT)

== References/Links ==

Check other articles for the proper formatting that you asked about, Jon.

Generally its the link formatted with [xxxxx] with any comments added at the end, one space between the end of the link, and then all of that enclosed by the ref tag. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:18, 3 May 2010 (EDT)
:Ahh.. It has changed a little since I've been around. I was used to people putting the &lt;title&gt; content as the ref-link names. ~ [[User_talk:JonG|JonG]] ~ 19:31, 3 May 2010 (EDT)

::Here is the example I forgot to paste in for you:
::<nowiki><ref>[http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/04/newark_ex_mayor_sharpe_james_convicted.html Mayor James convicted]</ref></nowiki> {{unsigned|TK}}
:::Yeah. That's exactly how I remember it. I was just in a rush earlier. Sorry. [[User:JonG|~]] [[User_talk:JonG|JonG]] [[User:JonG|~]] 23:13, 3 May 2010 (EDT)

== Referencias ==

Thank you! Mistakes like this one happens. Only those who write nothing don't make mistakes. Sorry. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 10:36, 4 May 2010 (EDT)
:They would have to be mute and paralyzed and a zombie as well, because those who do not write can still make mistakes. [[User:JonG|~]] [[User_talk:JonG|JonG]] [[User:JonG|~]] 19:36, 4 May 2010 (EDT)

== Once again, great work! ==

Once again, we're grateful for your work reverting vandals! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:03, 2 June 2010 (EDT)

== Sorry.... ==

But being blunt, without being mean, is exactly what we do here, Jon. Sorry if you were embarrassed (I didn't check to see if the unsigned post was you), but being direct, without weasel words, is what conservatives do. Did you check and see that Phyllis is an admin? Anyway, case closed! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:18, 9 July 2010 (EDT)
:Are you referring to the place where I pointed out someone's misspelling on a talk page? [[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]] 22:52, 9 July 2010 (EDT)
::Yes, yes. TK, I know she's an admin (I'm good friends with her). The question is, what does being an admin have to do with following rules? Ed Poor told me a while back not to point out misspellings on Debate, Talk, and User pages. [[User:JonG|~]] [[User_talk:JonG|JonG]] [[Special:Contributions/JonG|~]] 07:15, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
----
Thanks for letting me know about the apparent parodist. I will let Ashlafly police his talk page for the foreseeable future. As far as RobS, should have let ASchlafly intervene earlier as far as RobS as it would have been a better use of my time. I am moving on and attending to more important matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:45, 29 July 2011 (EDT)

== I was.... ==

grammatically correct. But never mind.--[[User:Aortuso|Aortuso]] 01:23, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

== Debate:Should Conservapedia develop a clear policy on standards for encyclopaedic and family-friendly content?‎ ==

You may be interested in the debate here: [[Debate:Should Conservapedia develop a clear policy on standards for encyclopaedic and family-friendly content?‎]] --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 02:23, 23 September 2011 (EDT)

== Accounts ==

Did you read what I said on SeanS's talk page? I was blocked for being "sock of Human,", which I am NOT, and given that there is absolutely no way to appeal blocks here using multiple accounts is the only way to regain access. Sorry, but if you want people to stop creating new accounts you need to sort out the blocking system so people can have some hope of redress for unjustified blocks. It's not my fault; it's CP's. --[[User:BernhardtC|BernhardtC]] 10:08, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
:Yes, I read what you said. If they say you're a sock, then they're basing it off of your IP address being shared with a previous user. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 10:17, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
::Then they need to have a serious think about their policy, because guess what? Thanks to the wholesale blocking of IP ranges, many people can only access CP through a proxy. Blocks should only be done on the basis of a user's behaviour, not the fact that someone else might have used the same IP address. It almost seems like CP doesn't WANT new editors... --[[User:BernhardtC|BernhardtC]] 10:22, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
584

edits

Navigation menu