Changes

== Equivelent ==

== Equivelent ==

Many of the questions in the test can be rewritten in an reversed form. I am intersted to hear peoples views on whether they belive these opposite questions could be substituted for the current ones without affecting the validity of the test. If you feel that these reversed question would invalidate the test then how can they be valid in their current form either? If you don't think it would invalidate the test then why not make the test a mixture of conservative and liberal slanted questions?

Many of the questions in the test can be rewritten in an reversed form. I am intersted to hear peoples views on whether they belive these opposite questions could be substituted for the current ones without affecting the validity of the test. If you feel that these reversed questions would affect validity, then how can they be valid in their current form either? If you don't think it would affect validity, then why not make the test a mixture of conservative and liberal slanted questions?

Two examples

Two examples

: 1. Do you resist admitting the possibility that a liberal approach to education is far more effective for students than a conservative one?

: 1. Do you resist admitting the possibility that a liberal approach to education is far more effective for students than a conservative one?

:12. Do you think that creation by an intelligent designer ''must'' have occurred?

:12. Do you think that creation by an intelligent designer ''must'' have occurred?