Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − +
Talk:Liberalism and bestiality (view source)
Revision as of 11:57, October 8, 2011
, 11:57, October 8, 2011→Wow, it's going better and better
Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
:::I don't know about the figures you allege, but Conservapedia has over [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics 37,000 content pages according to the MediaWiki software.] Generally speaking, the liberals tend to whine about the ones which offer information that show the folly and depravity of liberalism. Of course, the articles in question are no exception to this rule. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 07:53, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
:::I don't know about the figures you allege, but Conservapedia has over [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics 37,000 content pages according to the MediaWiki software.] Generally speaking, the liberals tend to whine and bellyache about the ones which offer information that show the folly and depravity of liberalism. Of course, the articles in question are no exception to this rule. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 07:53, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
== "All liberals are atheists" ==
== "All liberals are atheists" ==