Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  01:08, October 9, 2011
m
→‎Antitrust Policy in the United States: Turned "provedin" into "proved in"
Line 23: Line 23:  
secret rebate deals with railroads to build a monopoly in the oil business. A federal criminal lawsuit alleged the illegal rebates continued after 1900. In 1911 the Supreme Court upheld the court decision against Standard Oil and broke the monopoly into three dozen separate companies that eventually competed with one another, including Standard Oil of New Jersey (later known as Exxon and Exxon-Mobil), Standard Oil of Indiana (Amoco), of New York (Mobil), of California (Chevron), and so on.  
 
secret rebate deals with railroads to build a monopoly in the oil business. A federal criminal lawsuit alleged the illegal rebates continued after 1900. In 1911 the Supreme Court upheld the court decision against Standard Oil and broke the monopoly into three dozen separate companies that eventually competed with one another, including Standard Oil of New Jersey (later known as Exxon and Exxon-Mobil), Standard Oil of Indiana (Amoco), of New York (Mobil), of California (Chevron), and so on.  
   −
In approving the breakup of Standard Oil the Supreme Court added the "[[Rule of reason]]": not all big companies, and not all monopolies, are evil. They had to somehow damage the economic environment of their competitors.  Roosevelt for his part distinguished between "good trusts"--which built the world's greatest economy--and bad ones which preyed on smaller fry.  Thus U.S. Steel Corporation, which was much larger than Standard Oil, won its antitrust suit in 1920 because it provedin court that it was well behaved.  Labor unions, whose use of boycotts and strikes was banned by courts as a restraint of trade, hated the original Sherman Act; they were given relief in the Clayton Act of 1914.   
+
In approving the breakup of Standard Oil the Supreme Court added the "[[Rule of reason]]": not all big companies, and not all monopolies, are evil. They had to somehow damage the economic environment of their competitors.  Roosevelt for his part distinguished between "good trusts"--which built the world's greatest economy--and bad ones which preyed on smaller fry.  Thus U.S. Steel Corporation, which was much larger than Standard Oil, won its antitrust suit in 1920 because it proved in court that it was well behaved.  Labor unions, whose use of boycotts and strikes was banned by courts as a restraint of trade, hated the original Sherman Act; they were given relief in the Clayton Act of 1914.   
    
The biggest problem under Sherman was that businessmen did not know what was allowed and what was not. Therefore in 1914 Congress set up the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which defined anti-competitive behavior, and provided an alternative mechanism to police anti-trust.  
 
The biggest problem under Sherman was that businessmen did not know what was allowed and what was not. Therefore in 1914 Congress set up the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which defined anti-competitive behavior, and provided an alternative mechanism to police anti-trust.  
SkipCaptcha
259

edits

Navigation menu