Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Feudalism had been successful in defending against Viking invasions: Feudalism was a very effective system of defense, with friendly competition developing some superb warriors.
Line 33: Line 33:     
Really? I would argue that feudalism was useless at defending against Viking activity (Viking is a verb, by the way, not a noun.) The Norse took over most of England, parts of France and most of European Russia, and extirpated Christianity from most of the land they conquered. Feudalism only developed into a successful system 150-200 years after the power of the Norse faded away. --[[User:VTraynor|VTraynor]] 22:19, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
 
Really? I would argue that feudalism was useless at defending against Viking activity (Viking is a verb, by the way, not a noun.) The Norse took over most of England, parts of France and most of European Russia, and extirpated Christianity from most of the land they conquered. Feudalism only developed into a successful system 150-200 years after the power of the Norse faded away. --[[User:VTraynor|VTraynor]] 22:19, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Feudalism was developing as the Vikings were fading power.  Feudalism was a very effective system of defense, with friendly competition developing some superb warriors.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:28, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,891

edits

Navigation menu