Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:  
I don't think the lists should count.  The purpose of the counter (I would assume) is to give an acurate measurement of the '''substance''' of the site.  The term lists do not contain any substance, only links to other pages, therefore they should not be counted.  It would be false advertizing to count them.  Also I agree with Dpbsmith that we should only give the number in thousands.
 
I don't think the lists should count.  The purpose of the counter (I would assume) is to give an acurate measurement of the '''substance''' of the site.  The term lists do not contain any substance, only links to other pages, therefore they should not be counted.  It would be false advertizing to count them.  Also I agree with Dpbsmith that we should only give the number in thousands.
 
--[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 11:50, 6 January 2007 (EST)
 
--[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 11:50, 6 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
'''Comment''' A big reason why I defend including the key term lists in the entry count is that the key term lists represent a great deal of helpful work.  I've spent hours building some of them.  One key list has much more value to students than a single entry.  A very helpful entry, such as a list, should be included in the overall count.  Let's give credit where it is due.
 +
 +
Wikipedia's entry count includes a huge amount of junk, like new words used by pop singers in someone's favorite song.  Not that I want to imitate Wikipedia, but a useful term list has value and should count.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:29, 6 January 2007 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Navigation menu