37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + + + + +
Talk:Liberalism and bestiality (view source)
Revision as of 19:30, October 14, 2011
, 19:30, October 14, 2011no edit summary
::::Please explain for each internal link why it has no relevance. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:31, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
::::Please explain for each internal link why it has no relevance. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:31, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
:::::Ok...he defends abortion, do all pro-abortionist people defend this position? If not, then why does it matter? The same for euthanasia. As for infanticide, saying he is for it is a little misleading IMO, he merely states that babies are incapable of rational thought and autonomy, I don't think he actually advocates killing them. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 10:00, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
:::::Ok...he defends abortion, do all pro-abortionist people defend this position? If not, then why does it matter? The same for euthanasia. As for infanticide, saying he is for it is a little misleading IMO, he merely states that babies are incapable of rational thought and autonomy, I don't think he actually advocates killing them. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 10:00, 8 October 2011 (EDT)
==Typo==
''The atheist philosopher Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality (as well as abortion, infanticide and euthanasia)''
It was my understanding that the CP position is that abortion and infanicide are the same thing, so including both is redundant. You should simply make it infanticide and euthanasia, because it's common knowledge on CP that abortion falls under infanticide. --[[User:SpenserL|SpenserL]] 15:30, 14 October 2011 (EDT)