Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 02:45, October 15, 2011

634 bytes added ,  02:45, October 15, 2011
→‎A few sections that should be removed...: reply re: points 12 and 26
Line 288: Line 288:  
29: This is actually wrong. The age of each twin is independent of the path travel, it is dependent only on the acceleration they experience. Therefore, this point is wrong.
 
29: This is actually wrong. The age of each twin is independent of the path travel, it is dependent only on the acceleration they experience. Therefore, this point is wrong.
 
Any comments or disagreements? - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 22:02, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
 
Any comments or disagreements? - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 22:02, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:On point 12, physicists themselves admit that relativity contradicts quantum mechanics shortly after the Big Bang.  So even relativists would (or should) concede the validity of this counterexample.
 +
 +
:On point 26, GPS's were not developed as a result of relativity.  This has been discussed at length on this site in the past.  No relativists were involved in the engineering of GPS's; any differences in timing on the satellites relative to ground are more easily corrected by synchronization rather than theoretical predictions.
 +
 +
:Will review the other points later.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:45, 14 October 2011 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/928283"

Navigation menu