74
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 18:55, October 15, 2011
, 18:55, October 15, 2011→Path Independence and Photons
:::As to the second point, I find the argument somewhat circular. Is the energy equation cited verified by any experiment, or is it merely definitional? If merely definitional, then it does not provide a way for calculating actual momentum.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:54, 15 October 2011 (EDT)
:::As to the second point, I find the argument somewhat circular. Is the energy equation cited verified by any experiment, or is it merely definitional? If merely definitional, then it does not provide a way for calculating actual momentum.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:54, 15 October 2011 (EDT)
::::Well answer them. The point I'm making is that <b>there is no vector field such that when integrates it, one gets time. </b> I had never heard of it until then. I am asking you to enlighten me.
<br />
::::And as a matter of fact there is! The equation is E=hf where E is the energy of the photon, f is the frequency of the photon, and h is just a proportionality constant (known as Planck's constant). And it has been experimentally verified. It explains the spectrum from blackbody radiation and it explains the photoelectric effect. And if I recall correctly, your camera uses the photoelectric effect. These things are quite well known... [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 14:55, 15 October 2011 (EDT)
==FTL Neutrinos at LHC ==
==FTL Neutrinos at LHC ==