Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
423 bytes added ,  20:05, October 19, 2011
no edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:  
Thank you so much! That really means a lot to me. And I plan to hold myself to a high standard. Unfortunately, I don't think Andrew and Conservative saw that comment the same way you did. Given all their talking about the "liberal mainstream media bias" and that I'm not in any of Andrew's classes, I worry that they might distrust me in the future. Conservative has already accused me of being an "obsessive atheist" for my questions once. Do I have reason to worry or am I being a little paranoid? :/ --[[User:SpenserL|SpenserL]] 14:44, 19 October 2011 (EDT)
 
Thank you so much! That really means a lot to me. And I plan to hold myself to a high standard. Unfortunately, I don't think Andrew and Conservative saw that comment the same way you did. Given all their talking about the "liberal mainstream media bias" and that I'm not in any of Andrew's classes, I worry that they might distrust me in the future. Conservative has already accused me of being an "obsessive atheist" for my questions once. Do I have reason to worry or am I being a little paranoid? :/ --[[User:SpenserL|SpenserL]] 14:44, 19 October 2011 (EDT)
 
:I don't know enough to comment on that particular issue. There is very much a liberal bias in many "mainstream" media outlets, but I think the problem is not so much that the people running them are liberal; these people simply do not care, more often than not. Although that sounds bleak, it means that biases that occur do so as a result of individual people (the majority, unfortunately) with those political beliefs. This gives you a great chance, because if you are actually free from bias, your publications will reflect that. The institutional bias occurs because most people in the business are ''not'' free of such biases. [[User:KevinDavis|Kevin Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]</sup> 15:45, 19 October 2011 (EDT)
 
:I don't know enough to comment on that particular issue. There is very much a liberal bias in many "mainstream" media outlets, but I think the problem is not so much that the people running them are liberal; these people simply do not care, more often than not. Although that sounds bleak, it means that biases that occur do so as a result of individual people (the majority, unfortunately) with those political beliefs. This gives you a great chance, because if you are actually free from bias, your publications will reflect that. The institutional bias occurs because most people in the business are ''not'' free of such biases. [[User:KevinDavis|Kevin Davis]] <sup>[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]</sup> 15:45, 19 October 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
==My Source==
 +
"Who's having abortions (religion)?
 +
Women identifying themselves as Protestants obtain 37.4% of all abortions in the U.S.; Catholic women account for 31.3%, Jewish women account for 1.3%, and women with no religious affiliation obtain 23.7% of all abortions. 18% of all abortions are performed on women who identify themselves as "Born-again/Evangelical"."
 +
http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html
19

edits

Navigation menu