nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 202:
Line 202: + +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 07:47, April 8, 2007
, 07:47, April 8, 2007→What's this article trying to achieve?: Not illogical.
:::Well, this discussion has gone as far as it can. The illogic displayed by Philip is a clear indication that he is not willing to learn anything, and that his lithocephalic attachment to what he "believes" will neither allow him to learn nor to debate in a rational manner. Sad, really. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:59, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Well, this discussion has gone as far as it can. The illogic displayed by Philip is a clear indication that he is not willing to learn anything, and that his lithocephalic attachment to what he "believes" will neither allow him to learn nor to debate in a rational manner. Sad, really. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:59, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::So now you accuse me of being illogical without showing that I have been illogical. Nice. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:47, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
== Protected debate page? ==
== Protected debate page? ==