Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
346 bytes added ,  15:59, October 26, 2011
Line 121: Line 121:     
===Fallacies of relevance based on the age of an idea===
 
===Fallacies of relevance based on the age of an idea===
The '''appeal to antiquity''', also known as the '''appeal to tradition''', holds that an idea must be right just because it is old.<ref>[http://www.logicalfallacies.info/relevance/appeals/appeal-to-tradition/ Appeal to Antiquity / Tradition]</ref>  Its opposite is the '''appeal to novelty''', which holds that an idea must be right just because it is new.<ref>[http://www.logicalfallacies.info/relevance/appeals/appeal-to-novelty/ Appeal to Novelty]</ref>
+
The '''appeal to antiquity''', also known as the '''appeal to tradition''', holds that an idea must be right just because it is old.<ref>[http://www.logicalfallacies.info/relevance/appeals/appeal-to-tradition/ Appeal to Antiquity / Tradition]</ref>  Its opposite is the '''appeal to novelty''', which holds that an idea must be right just because it is new.<ref>[http://www.logicalfallacies.info/relevance/appeals/appeal-to-novelty/ Appeal to Novelty]</ref> Both are fallacies of relevance because the mere age of an idea does not tell us whether it is true.  For example, an old idea could be a time-tested and sound concept, or it could be an ancient [[superstition]] like [[astrology]].  Similarly, a new idea could be the result of new [[information]] or an intellectual fad like [[postmodernism]].
    
==Fallacies of Defective or Weak Induction==
 
==Fallacies of Defective or Weak Induction==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu