8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 91:
Line 91: + +
Talk:NATO war in Libya (view source)
Revision as of 04:53, October 27, 2011
, 04:53, October 27, 2011→Good article
==Good article==
==Good article==
I think we have a very good, comphrehensive article going here. Now we need to elevate it's visibility by getting daily links to it from the Main Page. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:58, 5 June 2011 (EDT)
I think we have a very good, comphrehensive article going here. Now we need to elevate it's visibility by getting daily links to it from the Main Page. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:58, 5 June 2011 (EDT)
I want to ask a minor question. For this article to be good, wouldn't it need mention of why NATO got involved in the first place? I.E., the whole civilians getting cut in half by autocannon shells aspect of it all. [[User:TacticsNerd|TacticsNerd]]
== Berluskahn, a plot? ==
== Berluskahn, a plot? ==