603
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + +
Debate:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics "When did Brahms live" or "Why did Monet paint grainstacks?" (view source)
Revision as of 15:05, April 8, 2007
, 15:05, April 8, 2007no edit summary
Conservapedia seems to be reinventing the wheel. Since the main focus of its articles are to prove that the right is better than the left, much is left out. Scientific articles are mostly articles about creation science. Historical articles seem to talk about the US no matter what they're discussing. Biographical articles tend to focus on the subject's political views. And many articles on neutral topics don't exist (nothing on Guatemala for instance). This is fine for a political blog, but I don't see how conservapedia expects to be a resource, when its article on Moscow says 'Moscow is the capital of Russia' and nothing else. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 09:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Conservapedia seems to be reinventing the wheel. Since the main focus of its articles are to prove that the right is better than the left, much is left out. Scientific articles are mostly articles about creation science. Historical articles seem to talk about the US no matter what they're discussing. Biographical articles tend to focus on the subject's political views. And many articles on neutral topics don't exist (nothing on Guatemala for instance). This is fine for a political blog, but I don't see how conservapedia expects to be a resource, when its article on Moscow says 'Moscow is the capital of Russia' and nothing else. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 09:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:: Funny you should cite [[Moscow]], just two days ago I added an entry about Moscow, Idaho. And my point is that we can make this a good place. Give it time, both your precious time and a few more months of linear time. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 11:05, 8 April 2007 (EDT)