Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:  
::They have sequenced human and chimp DNA and estimate that there is about a 2% difference between the two.  If chimps are animals, then human DNA codes 98% animal. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 10:43, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::They have sequenced human and chimp DNA and estimate that there is about a 2% difference between the two.  If chimps are animals, then human DNA codes 98% animal. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 10:43, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::That is only relevant if you are using that as part of your classification system.  They've also found that humans have about 50% of their DNA in common with bananas, so does that make us 50% plants?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::That is only relevant if you are using that as part of your classification system.  They've also found that humans have about 50% of their DNA in common with bananas, so does that make us 50% plants?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::::No, but it indicates that humans and plants forked from each other a lot earlier than humans and chimps did.  [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 11:48, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== That particular definition ==
 
== That particular definition ==
    
As per '''grand''' consensus on this discussion page and the discussion page of [[Theory of Evolution]], I am removing the fourth definition. [[User:GofG | GofG]] [[Special:Contributions/GofG|<sub>|</sub><sup>|</sup><sub>|</sub>]] [[User talk:GofG | Talk]] 09:51, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
As per '''grand''' consensus on this discussion page and the discussion page of [[Theory of Evolution]], I am removing the fourth definition. [[User:GofG | GofG]] [[Special:Contributions/GofG|<sub>|</sub><sup>|</sup><sub>|</sub>]] [[User talk:GofG | Talk]] 09:51, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
603

edits

Navigation menu