14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 171:
Line 171: +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 16:55, April 8, 2007
, 16:55, April 8, 2007→What's this article trying to achieve?
:::::Well, technically, the only thing we know is that second-hand accounts claimed that Jesus endorsed what Genesis said. We ain't got nothin' from Jesus himself. Jesus didn't write anything. --[[User:ReaganLives|ReaganLives]] 08:46, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::Well, technically, the only thing we know is that second-hand accounts claimed that Jesus endorsed what Genesis said. We ain't got nothin' from Jesus himself. Jesus didn't write anything. --[[User:ReaganLives|ReaganLives]] 08:46, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::If you want to get technical about it, the ultimate author of the Bible was God, Jesus is God, ergo Jesus is the author of the Bible, so we do have it from Jesus Himself. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:33, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::If you want to get technical about it, the ultimate author of the Bible was God, Jesus is God, ergo Jesus is the author of the Bible, so we do have it from Jesus Himself. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:33, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::I think Jesus is inerrant, therefore he couldn't have written the Bible. Too many internal consistencies. Why don't you believe Jesus is inerrant? Are you a liberal? --[[User:ReaganLives|ReaganLives]] 12:55, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:Or so it's reported in the Gospels.
:Or so it's reported in the Gospels.