Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:     
:Sounds good to me ... please add it as you think best!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:48, 6 January 2011 (EST)
 
:Sounds good to me ... please add it as you think best!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:48, 6 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
:I disagree.  Look at the overall film/play.  This was definitely a counter-culture film thinly disguised as a quaint musical drama.  The message was that Tradition is bad, illogical, and keeps people stuck in their ways when they should embrace the new, simply because it's new.  When Tevye explains the traditions and why they're there in the beginning, he mentioned that they keep their heads covered and they wear their prayer shawl.  He then asks, "How did this tradition get started?," and he responds, "I don't know."  This sets up the rest of the show.  Because never do they explain why they use a Matchmaker, or why they don't let people arrange their own matches, or why men and women dance separately.  They even have the old rabbi getting down with the new changes, never defending what was before.  Message:  Traditions are stale and old and have no place in the modern world.  Relax and just let things happen.  Then the film gives us the drama of Chava marrying a Christian, marrying outside of her faith, and that's where Tevye can't abide it.  By then, it seems that Tevye's objection is only based on ridiculous emotion, rather than anything objective.  All this, in spite of the fact that change is coming, one that cannot be stopped by the traditions these people hold.  This is not a Conservative message at all, but one that is quite subversive.  If this had been written from a Conservative approach, we would've gone into the reasons behind the traditions, because they're not irrational or unreasonable.  The reason for a Matchmaker, the way they dress, and the way they eat, and the dancing, all is meant to preserve their heritage as Jews living in Tsarist Russia.  The Matchmaker keeps the Jewish men and women within the community, and within the faith, all the while helping to maintain peace and stability within the community itself.  The point I'm making is that Traditions have a purpose, even if we disagree with them.  And the notion that happiness comes from something material, as in the case of the marriage between Motel and Tzeital, is a direct message against a person's obligations to his or her duty, both to themselves and their community they live in.  No, I'd say Fiddler on the Roof is not a Conservative film.  --[[User:Wayfinder|Wayfinder]] 20:15, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
    
== Gattaca ==
 
== Gattaca ==
16

edits

Navigation menu