Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 451: Line 451:  
:::I have never seen the fallacy described as applying to a group.  I think you are changing the definition of this fallacy. Second, the article doesn't claim that the existence of overweight atheists means that God exists. If it had, you would certainly have pointed that out.  The issue of a segment of the atheist community ignoring nutritional science, exercise science and medical science seems to upset you. By the way, if memory serves, if you had read the talk page more carefully, I believe this issue was already covered. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:25, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
 
:::I have never seen the fallacy described as applying to a group.  I think you are changing the definition of this fallacy. Second, the article doesn't claim that the existence of overweight atheists means that God exists. If it had, you would certainly have pointed that out.  The issue of a segment of the atheist community ignoring nutritional science, exercise science and medical science seems to upset you. By the way, if memory serves, if you had read the talk page more carefully, I believe this issue was already covered. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:25, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::By the way, I believe the amount of atheist obesity in many societies will decrease as there will be less atheists.  I suggest reading: [[Essay: Will American atheism be cut by at least 50%?]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:38, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::By the way, I believe the amount of atheist obesity in many societies will decrease as there will be less atheists.  I suggest reading: [[Essay: Will American atheism be cut by at least 50%?]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:38, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
 +
::::::I hadn't noticed the others, thanks for the heads up. Shall I remove this section? It seems unnecessary. --[[User:Swinefish|Swinefish]] 23:07, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
8

edits

Navigation menu