635
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Has conservapedia failed to reach a critical mass? (view source)
Revision as of 17:05, April 8, 2007
, 17:05, April 8, 2007Spring sprung
Discuss.
Discuss.
==YES!==
==NO!==
==Comments==
I think there is still time to reach a self-sustainable level wherein the editors and sysops could both add significant material at the same time reverting vandalism and generally keeping the place "tidy".
A problem of sorts rears it's head because it seems as if there is an unwritten "policy" that seeks to ''control'' at all times, what is being placed upon these pages.
Just like a lawn, one has to expect a certain amount of weeds. One needs to start out with good soil from which grass seed can germinate and flourish. If one trods upon the seeds trying to ferret off each and every weed seed, the grass will also suffer, growing in clumps and spot and dying in other places.
Perhaps the thing to do is let the yard go? Let all that is to grow, grow; after a time it will be necessary to go in and pull weeds and allow the healthy good grass to fill in the spots left bare from this weeding. [[User:Rob_Pommer| Chance the Gardener]]<sup>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer| Talk</sup>]]