186
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
Debate:Has conservapedia failed to reach a critical mass? (view source)
Revision as of 17:27, April 8, 2007
, 17:27, April 8, 2007→NO!: question
All the curiosity seekers have come and gone, leaving a stable of serious editors who can build the Conservapedia in relative peace. When the article count approaches 100,000, perhaps in a year, then many will take another look and hopefully like what they see. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 13:26, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
All the curiosity seekers have come and gone, leaving a stable of serious editors who can build the Conservapedia in relative peace. When the article count approaches 100,000, perhaps in a year, then many will take another look and hopefully like what they see. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 13:26, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
: do we have any figures on article growth? trends in editor numbers? --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 13:27, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
==Comments==
==Comments==